View All Due Date - GST || Faqs on Notification No. 36/2025 dated 22.04.2025 || Due Date - GST || Due Date - GST || Claims that Government is considering levying Goods and Services Tax (GST) on UPI transactions over Rs.2,000 are completely false, misleading, and without any basis || CBIC issues revised instructions for processing applications for GST registration by CBIC formations || Instructions for processing of applications for GST registration || Due Date - GST || Due Date - IT || Due Date - IT || Due Date - GST || Advisory on reporting values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B || Advisory on Table-12 of GSTR-1 or GSTR-1A || Due Date - GST || Due Date - GST || Due Date - IT || Advisory on Case Sensitivity in IRN Generation || Advisory for Biometric-Based Aadhaar Authentication and Document Verification for GST Registration Applicants of Assam || 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) is mandatory for all Taxpayers and Transporters from the 1st of April 2025 || Due Date - IT || Due Date - IT || Order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for waiver on levy of interest under section 201(1A)(ii)/206C(7) of the Act, as the case maybe, in specific cases || Time Limit for Reporting e-Invoice on the IRP Portal – Lowering of Threshold to AATO 10 Crores and Above || Various issues related to availment of benefit of Section 128A of the CGST Act, 2017 || Due Date - GST ||

GST

Levy under Rajasthan APMC Act is Fee and not Cess and therefore not abolished after rollout of GST

Civil Writ Petition No.1451/2018 in the Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan High Court has held that the levy under section 17 of the Rajasthan Agriculture Produce Marketing Act, 1961 is a ‘Fee’ and not a cess and therefore, the same is not abolished after the rollout of GST. The Imarti Lakdi Vyapari Sansthan had filed petition contending that the State Government has no power to charge tax/cess payable under the provisions of Rajasthan Agriculture Produce Marketing Act, 1961 from its members. It was contended that the cess on the purchase and sale of timber from the members of the petitioner society is illegal, as the same is not an agricultural produce. It was also contended that after the introduction of GST, the impugned cess cannot continue. The High Court however negated such contentions.